Yesterday came an unusual springtime election day, with special elections in Florida and Wisconsin. Wisconsin’s elections featured an off-year Supreme Court race and a Constitutional amendment requiring voter ID. Florida’s special elections, to fill vacancies in House Districts 1 and 6, returned Republicans by decisive margins. But the Wisconsin election results were mixed – leading some to suspect fraud, albeit an incomplete fraud campaign. The actual numbers do suggest that an investigation is in order. But the cause could be the usual Republican vulnerability in special elections.

Actual results of the special elections

Florida held special elections to replace Reps. Matt Gaetz (R-1st) and Mike Waltz (R-6th). Gaetz resigned abruptly after President Donald Trump nominated him to be Attorney General. (He had to withdraw his nomination, and is now a One America News Network anchor.) Mike Waltz, of course, is now the National Security Adviser to the President.

Jimmy Patronis, Chief Financial Officer for Florida, won in the First District, and Randy Fine won in the Sixth District. Both candidates faced Democratic opponents who outspent them – in fact Josh Weil outspent Randy Fine 9-1. Nevertheless each man won his seat with 57 percent of the vote.

The House of Representatives balance of power now moves to 220-213, with two more vacancies to fill. Both are in Democratic districts, after their respective incumbents died recently.

Congratulations Randy, a great WIN against a massive CASH AVALANCHE.
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114265353051503359

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114265559182115048

Wisconsin, again, had mixed results. A Constitutional amendment making voter ID a Constitutional requirement in elections passed, 63 percent to 37 percent.

VOTER I.D. JUST APPROVED IN WISCONSIN ELECTION. Democrats fought hard against this, presumably so they can CHEAT. This is a BIG WIN FOR REPUBLICANS, MAYBE THE BIGGEST WIN OF THE NIGHT. IT SHOULD ALLOW US TO WIN WISCONSIN, LIKE I JUST DID IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, FOR MANY YEARS TO COME!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114265988202750791

But liberal Judge Susan Crawford defeated her conservative opponent, Brad Schimel, 55 percent to 45 percent. The victory of Susan Crawford leaves the 4-3 conservative-equitarian balance unchanged. Crawford will replace Ann Walsh Bradley, an equitarian who declined to seek another term. (An equitarian is a trial judge who abuses his/her equity powers, or an appellate judge who assumes equity powers the court does not have.)

More numbers from the Wisconsin elections

Decision Desk has current total votes from the elections in Wisconsin. The two most important of these are the Supreme Court race and “Issue 1,” the voter ID public question.

Total votes, and proportions, in that race and public question, are:

State Supreme Court

Issue 1:

Thus 76,148 fewer voters voted in the public-question election than in the Supreme Court race.

The county-by-county “carry map” reflects an urban-rural divide. Even so, “No” on the public question won only in Dane County (seated in Madison) and Milwaukee County. Crawford is a “Favorite Daughter” of Dane County, but won in many more counties than these two. In fact, in many counties, twice as many people voted in the Supreme Court race as in the public question. Likewise, how did Susan Crawford carry Brown County (seated in Green Bay), while Issue 1 also carried the night?

The Undervote Conundrum

These results reflect a significant undervote in the Wisconsin election. Furthermore, that undervote distributes itself across all counties. In election parlance, an undervote is a ballot, or lot of ballots, with votes in only some, not all, races. Typically the top of the ticket gets all the attention. Voters vote at the top and ignore the races or public questions further down.

That demonstrably happened in the Election of 2020. Either:

• Democratic voters weren’t paying attention, especially in Florida where many Democrats lost their House seats, or:

• Those engaged in “stuffing the ballot box” prepared undervoted ballots and neglected those House races. (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., then Speaker of the House, must have been ready to strangle someone.)

Yesterday one of those two things happened again. But this time the error could not have been more egregious. Susan Crawford has made no secret of itching to assert her phantom equity powers and rule voter ID unconstitutional. But she will not have power to do that, because voters who did pay attention to Issue 1, voted Yes.

But undervoting alone cannot explain Crawford’s victory. After all, Yes received more votes than Crawford did, and No received the fewest votes of all. Did some voters actually vote for Crawford and vote Yes on Issue 1? That strains credulity.

Other election irregularities

In fact the Wisconsin elections were fraught with another irregularity. Precincts in “multiple counties,” including Milwaukee, ran out of ballots. That includes seven precincts in Milwaukee County alone. As an Officer of Election, your editor sees no excuse for that. Our registrar always supplies enough ballots to cover a hypothetical one hundred percent turnout in any election.

At University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, the Chairman of the English Department confronted several College Republicans members at their voter-information table. He shouted that they were too close to the on-campus polling place. They weren’t, and retorted that they were well over 100 feet away. That didn’t placate the chairman, who shouted, “The time for this is over” – and then overturned the table. Police cited that professor for disorderly conduct, and he posted $295 bond and must appear in court on May 7. State of Wisconsin v. Jose Felipe Alvergue, case no. 2025FO000479.

Nevertheless, Charlie Kirk, head of Turning Point USA, reminded his fellow conservatives of a stark reality:

We did a lot in Wisconsin, but we fell short. We must realize and appreciate that we are the LOW PROP party now. The party has been remade. Special elections and off-cycle elections will continue to be a problem without a change of strategy.

We are the party of welders, waiters, and plumbers. We are the party of people who work with their hands, who shower before and after work. Politics is an afterthought for many of our supporters. They have common sense and American values, but they are voters who must be CHASED.

Democrats have become the college indoctrinated, institutionalized, and government dependent HIGH PROP party. They live for politics. It is their religion.

You may hate Donald Trump, but he resurrected a dead GOP back to life. Voters who weren't on anyone's data rolls came out of the woodwork to vote for Donald Trump.

Our movement must begin to fully fund the infrastructure to match the Democrat machine. Our ideas are better. They're actually popular. But we need to match like for like. We need to out organize Democrats. We need to match their fundraising advantage.

Let Wisconsin be a wakeup call. Let it be a call to return to the frontlines. We won in November, but to save the Republican we must string together multiple victories and that starts in 2026.

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1907251439552053249

Simple inattention and apathy is a much larger problem than fraud. Too many people vote Yes on a public question without reading it. Yesterday that helped those who care about election integrity. But many more who voted for Crawford, didn’t vote on Issue 1. Or if someone stuffed ballot boxes, they ignored the Issue that will now make their “trade” more difficult.

But at least 1.1 million fewer people voted in Wisconsin yesterday, than voted in 2024. That, perhaps, is the real problem.

Link to:

The article:

https://cnav.news/2025/04/02/news/elections-spring-mixed-results/

Video:

Trump’s Truths after the Florida races and Wisconsin public question:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114265353051503359

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114265559182115048

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114265988202750791

Decision Desk links to Wisconsin results:

https://ddhq.io/results/2025/General/Wisconsin/

https://ddhq.io/results/2025/General/races/wisconsin-question-1-require-voter-photo-id-amendment-all-parties-ballot-question

Wisconsin v. Alvergue:

https://wcca.wicourts.gov/caseDetail.html?caseNo=2025FO000479&countyNo=18&mode=details

Charlie Kirk on the mixed result in Wisconsin:

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1907251439552053249

Declarations of Truth:

https://x.com/DecTruth

Declarations of Truth Locals Community:

https://declarationsoftruth.locals.com/

Conservative News and Views:

https://cnav.news/

Clixnet Media

https://clixnet.com/

Election integrity is back in the news this week, as even Elon Musk’s DOGE has produced relevant findings. A legislative leader in Michigan, and Missouri’s new top election official, both have announced action to make elections trustworthy again. So a more thorough review, both of the motives of the left in undermining election integrity and of how to run a trustworthy election quickly and efficiently, are in order.

Qualifications to review election integrity, both current status and reform plans

Your editor, once again, is an Officer of Election with nearly four years’ experience, including a full year as Chief. He knows how elections currently run, and what makes them vulnerable. Moreover he has received insights from several election integrity activists who have organized various kinds of protests of present systems.

One such activist – who shall remain nameless – urged voters to mutilate their ballots so that no scanner-tabulator could read them – but a human being could. The Attorney General directly threatened to prosecute him for that, and the State Secretary of State sent a letter to every registrar in every unit (that is, county or independent city), advising them to be on the lookout for anyone mutilating his ballot. Accordingly, that activist desisted from that campaign.

On the other hand, at least one registrar recognizes that power might fail during an election. Inclement weather is one possible cause. Accordingly, every Chief’s Bag contains paper poll books and instructions for counting ballots by hand until the power company can restore power.

The issues that affect election integrity today include without limit:

1. Voter rolls that still have names of voters who have died or moved out of State – or others who shouldn’t vote at all,

2. Ballot Marking Devices (BMDs) that produce output no human can read, and

3. Scanner-tabulators that provide no reliable assurance to anyone on the scene, including the Chief OOE, that the final vote count is accurate.

Latest findings from DOGE, etc.

Over the weekend, Elon Musk held a town hall in advance of tomorrow’s Special Supreme Court Election in Wisconsin. There the entire Congressional district map is under challenge. Musk fears that a liberal court will, in Equitarian fashion, throw out the map in favor of a map that favors Democrats. (An equitarian is a trial judge who abuses his equity powers, or an appellate judge who assumes equity powers his court does not have. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor of the United States Supreme Court are all equitarians and constitute that Court’s Equitarian Bloc.)

Joining Musk on the rally stage was one Antonion Gracias, a key member of Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). According to Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit, Musk and Gracias displayed a chart showing:

a dramatic spike in Social Security Numbers issued to non-citizens, soaring from 270,000 in 2021 to a mind-blowing 2.1 million in 2024. That’s almost 5 million non-citizens now embedded in the system—collecting benefits, draining taxpayer dollars, and, most alarmingly, infiltrating the voter rolls.

The arithmetic above might look incomplete, but it reflects incidence, or new cases every year. The five-million figure indicates prevalence, or total existing cases. Social Security remains today the mainstay of personal identification – though the law technically forbids that. The Social Security Administration is supposed to know who is, or is not, a citizen, and when someone dies. Clearly someone wasn’t paying attention. Musk called this:

a massive, large-scale program under the Biden administration to import as many illegals as possible—ultimately to change the voting map of the United States, disenfranchise the American people, and lock in a permanent deep-blue, one-party state from which there’d be no escape.

In fact the Social Security Administration lays itself wide-open to fraud by illegal immigrants. From Mr. Gracias:

And then you walk across the border. They do what’s called a “release on your own recognizance” and give you an NTA — a Notice to Appear — which is to appear before a judge. The wait times on judges are, on average, six years. Look it up on Grok — you’ll see it. Immigration judges — there are only 700 of them. This is 5.5 million people.

So what happens then? Once you’re in the country and you’ve got asylum through one of these pathways — and we mapped the whole thing out — you can apply for a work document. You file a 765 — that’s the work form. You get this form called the 766 — that’s the authorization. And then the Social Security Administration automatically sends you your Social Security number in the mail. No interview. No ID.

What that means for election integrity and Congressional representation

Lay aside the dreadful human cost of trafficking, a frequent means of illegal immigration. Think of how many people now have Social Security numbers – and are offering this as proof of citizenship. In too many States, that’s all the proof one needs to register to vote! Musk and Gracias pointed out that many of those five and a half million not only registered, but also voted.

This is what Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R-Va.) was trying to stop with his Executive Order for registration vetting. Recall, from CNAV’s discussion of Executive Order 35, that the Justice Department, and the Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights, sued to force the Commissioner of Elections to leave the voter rolls alone. They alleged that:

1. Noncitizen voting is “vanishingly rare,” and

2. Actual naturalized citizens were losing their right to vote.

Elon Musk has just offered further counterexamples against the first allegation. As to the second, any citizen so affected has ample opportunity to “square” that with his registrar.

Even when noncitizens do not register to vote – or lose voting registration without suffering deportation – their presence presents a problem. The United State Census now counts all persons, excluding only Native Americans who pay no U.S. taxes. Democrats object so vociferously to mass deportation for one reason only: there go their seats in the House of Representatives.

The Michigan election integrity investigation

Michigan is embroiled in a voter fraud scandal that dates from the Election of 2020, involving fraudulent voter registrations. Patty McMurray of The Gateway Pundit has followed that scandal for four years. In her latest report she describes the suspicions surrounding GBI Strategies, a Democrat-funded group specializing in voter registration. One month before the Election of 2020, the Clerk of Muskegon, Mich., noticed boxes of registrations mailed in from Auburn Hills – on the opposite side of the State. Many of these registration forms had the same addresses, and even the same handwriting.

The investigation began with the Muskegon Police Department. But it now involves the Michigan State Police and Michigan’s Secretary of State and Attorney General, both Democrats. Furthermore, more than one City or County Clerk received similar packages from GBI Strategies or its front group, Empower America. Somewhere in the process, the FBI – under Director Christopher Wray – entered the case.

Now State Rep. Rachelle Smit, Chair of the House Committee on Election Integrity, has announced her intention to press the FBI for progress on that investigation. She couldn’t have picked a better time for that pressing – because today the FBI has new, patriotic leadership. So has the Department of Justice, of course.

Equal time for hand-count advocates

Last comes a report of the most significant event in the debate on how and when to count ballots. This report comes from Joe Hoft, occasional Gateway Pundit contributor and host of his own show. The Missouri Clerks Association recently demonstrated electronic voting machines to a skeptical public. Now newly appointed Secretary of State Denny Hoskins has agreed to schedule a demonstration of hand counting. This demonstration will take place April 2, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon CDT.

https://x.com/PatriotFlyover/status/1902178686175977893

This equal-time demonstration might have been very difficult to arrange, except for a persistent problem with electronic voting machines. No one seems to know how to certify them. In August 2022, a State representative candidate sued the State,

alleging that the laboratories responsible for testing and certifying the state’s electronic voting equipment lacked proper legal accreditation, violating federal election law.

As Jim Hoft of TGP noted then, then-Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft had that suit removed to federal court. The next year, activists filed two formal complaints with the Secretary of State. They alleged noncompliance with State and federal law in electronic voting machine certification. Now Missouri has a new Secretary of State, who is open to election reform to ensure – or restore – election integrity.

In fact, activists in Virginia and many other States specifically allege that no certification of any Ballot Marking Device or scanner-tabulator can legitimately be valid under current procedures. Reasons include:

1. BMDs producing output that humans can’t read, but that the scanner-tabulator is supposed to read, and

2. Scanner-tabulators with proprietary software that therefore represents a secret count, in violation of nearly every State’s laws.

An actual hand-count proposal

About three weeks ago, Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) made news with a draft copy of his Make Elections Secure Again Act. Why he has not formally introduced this in the current Congress, CNAV will not speculate. To summarize, Mr. Sessions proposed that States conduct federal elections:

1. In precincts which each have 1500 or fewer registered voters,

2. With voting by mail available only to active-duty military and voters who show a health danger to self or others,

3. With paper poll books that voters must sign, said signature constituting an affidavit of citizenship and non-intent to vote elsewhere,

4. Making BMDs (that produce human-readable output) available only to the handicapped, and

5. Counting all votes by hand, in front of a live-streaming Webcam, by counters trained in advance.

Rep. Sessions did not consider doing away with the Australian Ballot that requires repeated handling to count multiple races. Nor did he consider reforming the college vote, which today skews left. (Though that might not hold much longer! President Trump captured 46 percent of the 18-29 vote.)

That said, election integrity, and reforms leading to it, enjoy the best popular support they’ve ever had. That a State Secretary of State would allow a hand-count demonstration on government property is a significant step. Given Elon Musk’s findings at the Social Security Administration, this couldn’t come at a better time.

Link to:

The article:

https://cnav.news/2025/03/31/foundation/constitution/election-integrity-front-center/

Video:

Video: Musk and Gracias reveal fraud at SSA:

Michigan election integrity investigation:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/mi-speaker-pro-tem-rachelle-smit-were-serious/

Equal time for hand-count advocates:

https://joehoft.com/missouris-new-secretary-of-state-levels-the-playing-field-with-election-integrity-push/

https://x.com/PatriotFlyover/status/1902178686175977893

Declarations of Truth:

https://x.com/DecTruth

Declarations of Truth Locals Community:

https://declarationsoftruth.locals.com/

Conservative News and Views:

https://cnav.news/

Clixnet Media

https://clixnet.com/

Two days ago, a free-lance investigative journalist on X released a long thread disclosing and explaining a shocking allegation. Apparently John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States, belongs to a judicial silent organization. But this is no ordinary silent organization. It consists entirely of judges (including one other Justice of the Supreme Court) and top-flight liberal or “equitarian” lawyers. This association creates an ideological conflict of interest for the Chief Justice. As such it casts doubt on the Court’s ability to function as the final arbiters of constitutional law.

The American Inns of Court

The American Inns of Court (AIC) take their name from the four London-based Inns of Court that date back to the Middle Ages. Every English or Welsh barrister, or trial advocate, must belong to one of these Inns:

• Gray’s Inn,

• Lincoln’s Inn,

• The Inner Temple, and

• The Middle Temple.

In addition, Northern Ireland has its own Inn of Court based in Belfast. (Apparently Scotland has no Inns of Court.) So the Inns of Court have a status equivalent to that of the American Bar Association.

The American Inns of Court are far different. They are completely voluntary, and membership is by invitation only. One of them – the Edward Bennett Williams (EBW) American Inn of Court – has recently requested that the general American Inns of Court organization strike its membership and other records from the general server farm. But that does not mean that the EBW Inn no longer meets! It does – and that their information is not even available at the general AIC site, makes them a silent organization. A silent organization is an invitation-only club that presumes to set policy for other institutions or agencies its members serve. Part of being a silent organization is to keep its membership list under very close guard.

Edward Bennett Williams, the namesake, was a founding partner of Williams and Connolly, a high-profile, elite – and Democratic – law firm.

On Thursday (March 20), X journalist Bad Kitty Unleashed released information linking Chief Justice Roberts to the EBW AIC.

John Roberts linked to EBW

This top post of the fifteen-post thread is in long form and serves as a good summary:

🔥🔥🔥Breaking exposé! FIVE anti Trump judges are involved in a secretive, INVITE ONLY club for judges and lawyers called the American Inns of Court. Even the membership and meetings are secret. But somehow the DOJ has shown up at meetings. At least since Biden had been in office.

Is hobnobbing with the DOJ in court matters acceptable? Let alone meeting in secret?

So who all is linked to this selective and secretive club? And recall all of their negative Trump rulings?

- Judge James Boasberg (President)

- Scotus Ketanji Brown Jackson (Vice President)

- Judge Amit Mehta (Secretary and a meeting held at her court.)

- Judge Beryl Howell

Justice (Professionalism Award)

-Justice John Roberts (Honorary Bencher of the Middle Temple)

Wasn’t it something else that Judge John Roberts broke ethical conduct and stuck up for his, “brother Boasberg”?

George Soros has funded a fellowship at Middle Temple where John Roberts is a master of the bench.

First let me very quickly explain how this secret society called, the American Inns of Court came about. In the UK, they have the four Inns of Court that dates back hundreds of years. One of those is called Middle Temple (see Roberts photo). Well, the US created the American version of this in recent decades. There’s a massive list of branches.

The branch many of our judges belong to is The Edward Bennett Williams (EBW) Inn of Court. It’s so secretive, they deleted most signs of this branch from their website although they still met.

Now here’s Judge Beryl Howell. She was nominated by President Judge Boasberg, and VP Ketanji Brown Jackson approved of her nomination. Boasberg claims it was her work on Jan 6 that contributed to his choosing her for the American Inns Of Court Professionalism award.

Let me show you the scant meeting info that I found which included the DOJ and Inspector General Horowitz in attendance.

1. The Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court: BOP Custody / Current Status of BOP / Early Release & Reentry: Washington DC, 2/15/24

“Joel Sickler – invited panelist at EBW Inn of Court (February15, 2024, Washington DC). The meeting held in the District of Columbia Court of Judge Amit Mehta. In addition to panelists, approximately 150 lawyers including several Federal District Judges were also present. The panel was presented primarily with Michael Horowitz, DOJ Inspector General and Seth Eichenholtz, Deputy Assistant Attorney General – also featuring Vanessa Rojas, a returning citizen with direct and learned perspective regarding constructive reforms within the Bureau of Prisons.”

Also there was:

“Seth Rosenthal, Chief Deputy Attorney General for Office of AG District of Columbia.”

2. Mathew Bester, 3 years ago in a quote Linkdn post:

“I really enjoyed talking about the latest DOJ developments last week on a great panel.”

Matthew was reposting Brent Gurney’s Post and yes the DOJ was there:

“I want to thank my co-hosts, Erin K. of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Lisa Phelan of Morrison & Foerster LLP, Inn member G. Zachary Terwilliger of Vinson & Elkins and our guest panelists Jim Fredricks of the DOJ Antitrust Division, Tiffany Rider of Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP and Matthew Bester of Accenture, for a robust and fascinating discussion of the issues.”

3. Yearly gala, I’ll review this later. But the Assistant United States Attorney at U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia replied in a comment. Was he there?

“Great job, Rebecca!”

I’ve seen lawsuits online for this secret org over recusal worries with this private club. I also saw a lawsuit that stated their secrecy is dangerous to democracy.

Sources to follow.

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902750686145810716

Herewith the rest of the thread:

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902754710387650887

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902761404471673308

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902766123294265590

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902774532085256399

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902777245695087090

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902790091900326377

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902801599233396768

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902807205881282639

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902813593525162096

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902818964947996839

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902826386093674768

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902864761802592256

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902871489004834898

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1903143095203750126

Bad Kitty Unleashed (BKU) shows that the EBW Inn of Court has a very sensitive membership. Organs like The Gateway Pundit make much of the affiliation of John Roberts with this organization. But BKU exposes more than that. Biden DOJ prosecutors, including ranking officers and key United States Attorneys and some of their assistants, were members.

BKU’s insights from her investigations, in order of mention, follow:

No trace of the EBW Inn of Court Inn ID 30072) remains on the American Inns of Court website. What links she has, come from the Wayback Machine or the new Archive Today service. Both feature the Officers listing for the EBW Inn of Court.

Membership in the EBW Inn of Court is by invitation only – and the invitations went out to current and former Federal prosecutors.

In 2017 one Linda Shao requested multiple recusals of Supreme Court Justices who had memberships in other American Inns of Court chapters. That list included all eight Justices then serving, except one: Justice Neil Gorsuch. That petition went to the Wayback Machine. (The Court denied review and rehearing in that case.)

Judge Beryl Howell received her invitation into the EBW Inn of Court in 2023. Judge James “Turn Those Planes Around” Boasberg, then President of the EBW Inn, issued that invitation.

Specific information on Chief Justice Roberts

Chief Justice Roberts holds the rank of Master of the Bench, the highest in American Inns of Court. He got that after London’s Middle Temple Inn of Court also conferred that title on him. The Middle Temple also has a shady affiliation with the Open Society Foundation – a George Soros organization. In fact the Middle Temple paid an “amity visit” to the U.S. Institute of Peace, known for radical leftist politics. This last archive also lists Justice Neil Gorsuch as a “Master of the Bench.”

BKU found information on three meetings of the EBW Inn. The first, dated February 15, 2024, took place in the courtroom of Judge Amit Mehta. It was a panel of the Justice Advocacy Group, that included prominent DOJ attorneys – and Michael Horowitz, the DOJ IG. (See also this second archive of a LinkedIn post with further details of that meeting.)

The second apparently took place in 2022 or late 2021, according to this archive of a LinkedIn post. The third and last meeting on BKU’s list took place in 2024, probably in May. This LinkedIn post probably tells little that one can’t already find out.

Summary

The American Inns of Court organization tracks 350 chapters, including the EBW Inn of Court. BKU concerns herself primarily with the EBW Inn, which at least includes Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Both have been members of the EBW Inn for some time – and Jackson serves as its Vice-President! Judges James Boasberg, Amit Mehta, and Beryl Howell, all of the D.C. District Court, are all members. This alone compromises the impartiality of the Supreme Court as it hears any appeal from these three judges. More troubling still are the memberships of key Biden Administration Justice Department attorneys – and the current “holdover” Inspector General.

If President Donald J. Trump wanted to “clean house” at Justice, he had a perfectly good reason. But perhaps he needs to fire IG Horowitz, in addition to all the other Inspectors General he fired.

CNAV shares the position of BKU that:

the Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court should be disbanded. And all DC justices barred from such activities.

CNAV also believes the House Judiciary Committee should investigate this matter immediately. Already Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) has filed Articles of Impeachment against Judge Boasberg. Partly in response to that, Chief Justice Roberts publicly rebuked President Trump and his allies. Their membership in the EBW Inn of Court presents an obvious conflict of interest. More to the point, the Judiciary Committee must investigate – comprehensively – whether the national judiciary is compromised, and to what extent. Perhaps a much larger round of judicial – and Justicial – impeachments is in order.

Link to:

The article:

https://cnav.news/2025/03/22/foundation/constitution/roberts-cj-judicial-silent-organization/

Video:

Bad Kitty Unleasned thread:

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902750686145810716

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902754710387650887

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902761404471673308

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902766123294265590

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902774532085256399

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902777245695087090

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902790091900326377

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902801599233396768

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902807205881282639

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902813593525162096

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902818964947996839

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902826386093674768

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902864761802592256

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902871489004834898

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1903143095203750126

Edward Bennet Williams American Inn of Court Wayback Machine and Archive Today capture links:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160605194243/https://inns.innsofcourt.org/inns/officers.aspx?innid=30072

https://archive.is/7tQUr

Current AIC Home Page:

https://www.innsofcourt.org/

Lawsuit demanding recusals of various Justices from a child-custody case out of California:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250319162646/https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-613/24382/20171219134413718_00000001.pdf

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/17-613.html

Other Archive Today and Wayback Machine links to key events involving the EBW and its judicial members:

https://archive.is/T2Ko8

https://archive.is/0vnS1

https://archive.is/q6uBg

https://web.archive.org/web/20250320150619/https://online.pubhtml5.com/vgjv/vhws/#p=34

https://archive.is/cd9S0

https://archive.is/RRHc8

https://archive.is/JUOWK

https://archive.is/E8ILg

Declarations of Truth:

https://x.com/DecTruth

Declarations of Truth Locals Community:

https://declarationsoftruth.locals.com/

Conservative News and Views:

https://cnav.news/

Clixnet Media

https://clixnet.com/